Unlocking Engagement: The Impact of Mentorship and Sponsorship on Remote Employees Across Diverse Backgrounds
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58593/e4kqtw68Keywords:
Engagement, Mentorship, sponsorship, EENDEED, Remote Employee EngagementAbstract
In today’s increasingly remote work environment, employee engagement is critical for maintaining organizational performance and competitive advantage. This study investigates the influence of sponsorship on remote employee engagement, while considering the effects of gender, education, and mentorship. Utilizing a hierarchical multiple regression analysis, data were collected through an online survey of 434 remote workers residing in the United States. The Enhanced Engagement Nurtured by Determination, Efficacy, and Exchange Dimensions (EENDEED) instrument was used to measure engagement, while the Mentoring Function Questionnaire assessed mentorship and sponsorship constructs. The study's findings reveal that both mentorship and sponsorship significantly enhance employee engagement. Specifically, mentorship accounted for 37% of the variance in engagement, and sponsorship contributed an additional 4% beyond the effects of gender and education. These results underscore the critical role of sponsorship in fostering employee engagement, highlighting its unique impact compared to mentorship. The study also demonstrates the importance of gender and education in shaping engagement, with female employees and those with higher education levels reporting higher engagement. While acknowledging limitations such as cross-sectional design and reliance on self-reported data, this research provides valuable insights for organizations aiming to support their remote workforce. Future research should explore the longitudinal effects of mentorship and sponsorship, include more diverse samples, and examine additional factors influencing engagement. By leveraging both mentorship and sponsorship, organizations can create a supportive environment that promotes professional growth, career advancement, and overall employee engagement.
References
Ali, M. S., & Jalal, H. (2018). Higher Education as a predictor of employment: The world of work perspective. Bulletin of Education and Research, 40(2), 79–90. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1209685
Alpaio, K. (2024). A guide to mentors, sponsors, and coaches. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/2024/01/a-guide-to-mentors-sponsors-and-coaches
Arthur, M. B. (1985). Book reviews: Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(3), 454–456. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392687
Ayyala, M. S., Skarupski, K., Bodurtha, J. N., Gonzalez-Fernandez, M., Ishii, L. E., Fivush, B., & Levine, R. B. (2019). Mentorship is not enough: exploring sponsorship and its role in career advancement in academic medicine. Academic Medicine, 94(1), 94–100. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002398
Balthazar, P., Murphy, A., & Tan, N. (2021). Mentorship, sponsorship, and coaching for trainee career advancement. RadioGraphics, 41(4), E100-E102. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2021210085
Breza, E., Kaur, S., & Shamdasani, Y. (2017). The morale effects of pay inequality. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(2), 611–663. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjx041
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Franklin Lartey, Dr. Phillip M. Randall, Susan Saurage-Altenloh, PhD, Dr. Tywanda D. Tate

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.