Measuring Empathy in Traditional and Remote Workplaces
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58593/cjar.v3i2.58Keywords:
Empathy, Employee Engagement, Remote Work, Hybrid Work, Lartey Empathy Measurement Scale (LEMS), Psychometric Validation, Social Cognitive Theory, Organizational Behavior, Dispassion, Dependability, Emotional PerceptionAbstract
Empathy is a pivotal leadership skill that shapes the quality of workplace interactions, particularly within today’s dynamic organizational environments. Yet, existing empathy measurement tools are largely tailored to clinical or therapeutic contexts (psychology, medicine, social work), leaving a critical gap in instruments suited to the demands of modern organizational settings, including traditional, hybrid, and remote work arrangements.
This study introduces the Lartey Empathy Measurement Scale (LEMS), a pioneering 12-item tool designed to assess empathy in professional environments. Developed using DeVellis’s eight-step scale development methodology, LEMS captures empathy through a three-factor model: Emotional Perception, Dispassion, and Dependability.
Psychometric validation was conducted with a sample of N = 650 professionals across diverse industries, split evenly for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). CFA results confirmed the model’s structure with strong fit indices: CMIN/DF = 2.04, GFI = .949, CFI = .958, TLI = .946, NFI = .922, IFI = .959, and RMSEA = .057 with PCLOSE = .225, indicating a close model fit. Internal consistency was supported across both samples, with each of the three factors demonstrating good reliability and stability. These results, along with strong validity evidence, confirm the robustness of the LEMS framework.
LEMS offers researchers and practitioners a reliable and contextually relevant framework for assessing empathy in the 21st-century workplace, supporting efforts to foster more empathetic, resilient, and engaged organizational cultures.
References
Allen, T. D., Shockley, K. M., & Biga, A. (2010). Work and family in a global context. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Going global: Practical applications and recommendations for HR and OD professionals in the global workplace (pp. 377–401). Jossey-Bass.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L
Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorder, 34(2), 163–175. http://doi.org/10.1023/b:jadd.0000022607.19833.00
Bensalah, L., Stefaniak, N., Carré, A., & Besche, C. (2016). The Basic Empathy Scale adapted to French middle childhood: Structure and development of empathy. Behavior Research Methods 48(4), 1410–1420. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0650-8
Berthoz, S., Grèzes, J., Armony, J. L., Passingham, R. E., & Dolan, R. J. (2006). Affective response to one’s own moral violations. NeuroImage, 31(2), 945–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.039
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. The Guilford Press.
Bubaš, G., Radošević, D., & Hutinski, Ž. (2003). Assessment of computer mediated communication competence: Theory and application in an online environment. Journal of Information and Organizational Sciences, 27(2), 53-71. https://hrcak.srce.hr/en/78394
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Franklin M. Lartey , Dr. Phillip M. Randall, Dr. Susan Saurage-Altenloh, Dr. Tywanda D. Tate

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.